UHRW Twitter taps into wave of widespread revulsion over HIU proposal

The Open Letter to all candidates and political parties calling on them to oppose the creation of the proposed Historical Investigations Unit (HIU) has tapped into a wave of widespread revulsion over the draft Stormont House Agreement Bill.

The News Letter devoted considerable space to news that the Open Letter, signed by ten groups, had been sent to all the parties.

Once it appeared in print, Ulster Human Rights Watch took to Twitter to expand the coverage. The UHRW only recently opened a Twitter account and was slowly building up followers on the popular platform.

Days out from the General Election, we extracted a line from the letter and used it in the opening sentence. It read: “There are many of us and we intend to vote.” We captured the on-line News Letter coverage and linked in senior politicians and more than twenty media outlets.

Fast forward twenty-four hours, and even though the UHRW Twitter account had a little more than thirty followers, our tweet packed a punch. In our terms and borrowing the phrase a description from the Twitter phrasebook, the tweet went viral.

By teatime on Sunday, we recorded no fewer than 14,856 impressions – that’s the number of people who saw the tweet – with 1,067 engagements or the number of times people interacted with the tweet.

We attracted 25 ‘likes’ from people who saw it and there were seventeen retweets which widened the net to an even larger audience.

Back to the letter. The letter we were proud to sign alongside either civilian, police or military veterans noted with regret the manner in which so-called ‘legacy issues’ had been handled. It called upon all individual candidates and all political parties “to state without equivocation their stance on the issue of the draft legislation arising from the Stormont house Agreement.”

The letter continued: “In particular, we call upon all parties to express their clear opposition to the proposed creation of a ‘Historical Investigations Unit’ (HIU).

“We believe that this proposal will:

  • create false expectations of long-delayed justice for victims of crime;
  • create new victims and re-victimise existing ones in relation to trauma;
  • undermine centuries of successful development of the rule of law by introducing arbitrary and capricious official opinions as a substitute for due process and judicial decisions;
  • breach numerous articles of the European Convention on Human Rights; and
  • facilitate a huge and expensive exercise in scapegoating those who worked to protect society whilst ignoring the perpetrators of violence.

“We will not countenance the perpetuation of what we see as a witch hunt – a witch hunt which is clearly designed to assist those who seek to re-write the history of the last fifty years in order to deflect attention from their heinous crimes, to justify terrorism and to blame others for the ensuing misery.

“We welcome the references in the manifestos of two of our main political parties to their concerns about the HIU. We now call upon all parties to repudiate the concept of any quasi-judicial definition of ‘collusion’. The law already provides for the investigation and punishment of conspiracy to murder, perverting the course of justice and all other associated crimes. Yet another new definition will only serve to perpetuate the myth of collusion – the greatest piece of ‘fake news’ to hit Northern Ireland.

“Candidates and all political parties – where do you stand? Are you for justice or are you for continuing the witch hunt?”

The organisations supporting the letter were:

County Armagh Phoenix Group (Police & Military Support)

Decorum NI (Police & Military support)

Justice for Northern Ireland Veterans

Mourne Action for Survivors of Terrorism

Northern Ireland Retired Police Officers Association

RUC GC Association

RUC GC Parents’ Association

South East Fermanagh Foundation

Ulster Human Rights Watch

Wounded Police and Families Association

We await responses from the parties ahead of polling day. Watch this space for updates.

Human Rights body calls on DUP to abandon Stormont House legacy plans

A Northern Ireland human rights organisation has written to the DUP leader, Arlene Foster, asking her to ‘firmly state’ that the party will no longer support the Stormont House Agreement legacy proposals. Unfortunately, until now, this has not happened and the ambiguous answers provided by various DUP representatives would appear to confirm that they still support these disastrous recommendations.

The open letter, sent to the DUP party leader, signed by both the Managing Director, Robert Campbell, and the Advocacy Support Manager, Axel Schmidt of the Ulster Human Rights Watch (UHRW), states that these proposals for dealing with the past will, without doubt, have a further detrimental impact on the innocent victims of terrorism.

It further states: “It is clear that representatives of the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) took part in the negotiations that produced these proposals, which once scrutinised have aroused grave concerns among victims of terrorism and members of the security forces, who protected society against the terrorist campaign in Northern Ireland.”

The UHRW’s analysis of these proposals, agreed by political consensus during the Stormont House talks and which recommended the establishment of four new bodies to “address the past”, clearly shows that rather than providing a significant improvement on current arrangements as suggested, they will have an adverse and detrimental impact on the victims of terrorism, both civilians and former members of the security forces (armed forces and police).

The letter continues “It is strongly believed among the victims of terrorism we represent that these proposals will undermine the due process of law and will provide the means by which those who engaged in terrorism and their sympathisers could justify terrorism and rewrite the history of the terrorist campaign in Northern Ireland” and, in doing so, will further alienate the innocent victims who already have suffered so much over the intervening years.

“Since these proposals were made public in May 2018, we have repeatedly raised legitimate, grave and well-founded concerns about the four proposed bodies, requesting that the DUP unequivocally disengage from them all so they can be replaced with a proper alternative. Unfortunately, until now this has not happened and the often contradictory and ambiguous answers provided by DUP representatives lead to the strong suspicion that the party is still wedded to these disastrous proposals.

The letter concludes “On behalf of victims of terrorism, including members of the security forces and their families, we would kindly ask you to firmly state that the DUP will no longer support the proposed SHA legislation about the Legacy of the Past.”

To view this letter click here.

To view Newsletter coverage click here.

To view Belfast Telegraph coverage click here

 

 

1 2 3 9
Search the site